From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Curley

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 20, 1971
184 S.E.2d 80 (S.C. 1971)

Opinion

19002

October 20, 1971.

Appeal from General Sessions Court, Marion County; John Grimball, Judge.

Messrs. Dusenbury Dusenbury, of Florence for appellants.

Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., and Emmett H. Clair and Robert H. Hood, Asst. Attys. Gen. of Columbia, and Solicitor T. Kenneth Summerford, of Florence, for respondent.


October 20, 1971.

ORDER


It having been determined by the Circuit Court, after an evidentiary hearing conforming with the judgment of this Court heretofore filed ( 253 S.C. 513, 171 S.E.2d 699), that the appellant, Pearson, after receiving the benefit of the procedural safeguards required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, with respect to the evidence admitted against him, voluntarily and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination, said appellant's conviction is, therefore, affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Curley

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 20, 1971
184 S.E.2d 80 (S.C. 1971)
Case details for

State v. Curley

Case Details

Full title:The STATE, Respondent, v. Vance Alexander CURLEY and James Pearson…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 20, 1971

Citations

184 S.E.2d 80 (S.C. 1971)
184 S.E.2d 80