From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cummings

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1943
28 S.E.2d 100 (N.C. 1943)

Opinion

(Filed 15 December, 1943.)

APPEAL by defendant from Nimocks, J., at September Term, 1943, of ROBESON.

Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Patton and Rhodes for the State.

F. D. Hackett for the defendant, appellant.


The defendant was convicted of an assault on a female, Lilly May Deese, and appealed to this Court, assigning error.

We have given careful attention to the exceptions presented on the appeal, and do not find any of sufficient merit to justify interference with the result of the trial. The exceptions, while carefully prepared and ably presented, involve no novel principles of law, and we have deemed it unnecessary to write an opinion.

We find

No error.


Summaries of

State v. Cummings

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1943
28 S.E.2d 100 (N.C. 1943)
Case details for

State v. Cummings

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. OSROW CUMMINGS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1943

Citations

28 S.E.2d 100 (N.C. 1943)
28 S.E.2d 100