Opinion
2 CA-CR 2024-0089
10-24-2024
The State of Arizona, Appellee, v. Nicholas Jeffrey Cryderman, Appellant.
Jill L. Evans, Flagstaff Counsel for Appellant
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court in Mohave County No. S8015CR202200409 The Honorable Lee Frank Jantzen, Judge
Jill L. Evans, Flagstaff
Counsel for Appellant
Presiding Judge O'Neil authored the decision of the Court, in which Judge Vasquez and Judge Kelly concurred.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
O' NEIL, Presiding Judge:
¶1 After a jury trial, Nicholas Cryderman was convicted of unlawful flight from a pursuing law enforcement vehicle. The trial court suspended the imposition of sentence and placed him on a two-year term of probation.
¶2 On appeal, counsel has filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Leon, 104 Ariz. 297 (1969), asserting she reviewed the record "for error or arguable questions of law but has found none." Consistent with State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), counsel has provided a factual and procedural history of the case with citations to the record and has asked this court to search the record for reversible error. Cryderman has not filed a supplemental brief.
¶3 Viewed in the light most favorable to affirming the verdict, see State v. Holle, 240 Ariz. 300, ¶ 2 (2016), the evidence is sufficient here, see A.R.S. § 28-622.01. In January 2022, when an Arizona Department of Public Safety detective attempted to stop Cryderman with lights and siren for two traffic violations, Cryderman began to slow down and move to the side of the road before accelerating and speeding away. The term of probation is within the statutory range. See A.R.S. §§ 13-902(A)(4), 28-622.01.
¶4 Pursuant to our obligation under Anders, we have searched the record for reversible error and have found none. See State v. Fuller, 143 Ariz. 571, 575 (1985). Accordingly, we affirm Cryderman's conviction and disposition.