From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cruz

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Jan 31, 2014
317 P.3d 149 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 109,003.

2014-01-31

STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Jose CRUZ, Appellant.


I fully join the first part of the court's opinion, which relies upon State v. Phillips, 289 Kan. 28, 34–35, 210 P.3d 93 (2009), to conclude that the probation-supervision fee assessed to a criminal defendant is not punitive and thus is not part of the sentence that must be orally pronounced from the bench. I express no opinion on the separate question of what a trial court must do to give proper consideration to whether a particular defendant's probation-supervision fee should be reduced or waived under K.S.A.2013 Supp. 21–6607(c)(3)(A). As the majority has recognized, determination of that issue is not necessary to resolve this appeal; I would wait for another case in which that issue is directly before us to address it.


Summaries of

State v. Cruz

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Jan 31, 2014
317 P.3d 149 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Cruz

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Jose CRUZ, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Jan 31, 2014

Citations

317 P.3d 149 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014)