From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Crossen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Mar 31, 1975
336 A.2d 239 (N.H. 1975)

Opinion

No. 6984

Decided March 31, 1975

1. Defendant's claim that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial should be addressed to the superior court.

Warren B. Rudman, attorney general, and Edward N. Damon, attorney, by brief for the State.

Ralph Crossen, pro se, by brief.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Defendant was convicted in a jury trial in which he was represented by counsel of two counts of selling a controlled drug. Defendant's exceptions were reserved and transferred by Cann, J.

A review of the transcript does not support the claim of the defendant that he did not receive a fair trial. The claim that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial should be addressed to the superior court. RSA 491:7 (Supp. 1973); State v. Long, 90 N.H. 103, 107, 4 A.2d 865, 868 (1939).

Exceptions overruled.


Summaries of

State v. Crossen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Mar 31, 1975
336 A.2d 239 (N.H. 1975)
Case details for

State v. Crossen

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RALPH CROSSEN

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Mar 31, 1975

Citations

336 A.2d 239 (N.H. 1975)
336 A.2d 239

Citing Cases

Riccardi v. Garabedian

These arguments are directed at issues that would arise in a motion for a new trial, and they should be…