Opinion
22-664 22-663
02-08-2023
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. KENTON CROOMS
Donald D. Landry, Lauren M. Hue COUNSEL FOR: State of Louisiana G. Paul Marx COUNSEL FOR: KENTON CROOMS
APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF VERMILION, NO. 63023 C/W 63022 HONORABLE THOMAS JAMES FREDERICK, DISTRICT JUDGE
Donald D. Landry, Lauren M. Hue COUNSEL FOR: State of Louisiana
G. Paul Marx COUNSEL FOR: KENTON CROOMS
Court composed of Candyce G. Perret, Charles G. Fitzgerald, and Guy E. Bradberry, Judges.
GUY E. BRADBERRY JUDGE
For the reasons set forth in the companion consolidated case hereto, State of Louisiana v. Robert Crooms, Jr., 22-663 (La.App. 3 Cir. ___/ ___/ ___), ___So.3d ___, the State has similarly failed to meet its burden of proving an abuse of discretion in the trial court's granting of Defendant's motion to quash. Accordingly, the ruling on the motion to quash for improper venue is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.