State v. Cromer

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Timothy Lamar Cromer, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: May 6, 2015

Appellate Case No. 2014-000050 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 6, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2014-000050 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-237

05-06-2015

The State, Respondent, v. Timothy Lamar Cromer, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia; and Timothy Cromer, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Newberry County
Eugene C. Griffith, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia; and Timothy Cromer, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹ APPEAL DISMISSED. SHORT, LOCKEMY, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.