State v. Crim

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Shondel Antwan Crim, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 10, 2014

Appellate Case No. 2013-001993 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-001993 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-454

12-10-2014

The State, Respondent, v. Shondel Antwan Crim, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Lexington County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Bryant, 383 S.C. 410, 418, 680 S.E.2d 11, 15 (Ct. App. 2009) ("An issue must be raised and ruled upon in the circuit court in order to be preserved for appellate review."). AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.