From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Crawford

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 4, 1976
339 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1976)

Opinion

No. 48399.

November 4, 1976.

Writ of Certiorari to District Court of Appeal, Fourth District.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Channing E. Brackey, Asst. Public Defender, for respondent.


We granted the petition for writ of certiorari in this cause without argument on the basis of an asserted conflict between the decision below, Crawford v. State, 321 So.2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), and the decision in Johnson v. State, 166 So.2d 798 (Fla.2d DCA 1964). See Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.

Finding no error in the decision under review, we approve the opinion and decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, 321 So.2d 559, and discharge the writ of certiorari.

OVERTON, C.J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Crawford

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 4, 1976
339 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1976)
Case details for

State v. Crawford

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. DANIEL CRAWFORD, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 4, 1976

Citations

339 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1976)

Citing Cases

Zeigler v. State

The rationale supporting the well-established rule that results of a polygraph examination are inadmissible,…

Keen v. State

At the new trial, the fact that no test ever occurred can be brought out so as to negate any inference that…