From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cotton

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Mar 27, 2015
NO. 2015 KW 0181 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 2015 KW 0181

03-27-2015

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. TALANDIS COTTON


In Re: Talandis Cotton, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 29400. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., McCLENDON AND HIGGINGOTHAM, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. Only those claims relating to the legality of the sentence itself under the applicable sentencing statutes may be raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence. State v. Gedric, 99-1213 (La. App. 1st Cir. 6/3/99), 741 So.2d 849, 851-52 (per curiam), writ denied, 99-1830 (La. 11/5/99), 751 So.2d 239. In the motion to correct an illegal sentence, relator does not argue his sentence is one "not authorized or directed by law." Instead, relator raises claims of trial error and constitutional violations, and such claims should be raised in a timely filed application for postconviction relief. See State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694 (per curiam).

TMH

VGW

PMc

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Cotton

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Mar 27, 2015
NO. 2015 KW 0181 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Cotton

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. TALANDIS COTTON

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 27, 2015

Citations

NO. 2015 KW 0181 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2015)