From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Corey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Dec 30, 1966
224 A.2d 841 (Me. 1966)

Opinion

December 30, 1966.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Kennebec County.

Bernard R. Cratty, County Atty., Augusta, for the State.

George M. Carlton, Jr., Bath, for respondent.

Before WILLIAMSON, C.J., and WEBBER, TAPLEY, MARDEN and DUFRESNE, JJ.


On report. Upon facts similar to a controlling degree to those in State v. Howe, Me., 219 A.2d 116 and upon the same issue of law, but while Howe was pending before this Court, this case was reported.

It was stipulated that if it be determined that the trial court properly dismissed the motion by the respondent to quash, judgment would be for the State.

The State seasonably briefed and argued its position at December Term, 1966. The respondent elected not to do so. He was given fifteen days in which to file reply brief and argue in writing. These fifteen days have expired. The respondent has elected to make no written representation.

Howe, supra, governs this case.

Judgment for the State.

RUDMAN, J., did not sit.


Summaries of

State v. Corey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Dec 30, 1966
224 A.2d 841 (Me. 1966)
Case details for

State v. Corey

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Robert A. COREY

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Dec 30, 1966

Citations

224 A.2d 841 (Me. 1966)

Citing Cases

State v. Malloch

We held valid a complaint so made, there being a substantial basis for crediting the hearsay evidence, such…