From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Conner

Court of Appeals of Kansas
Jul 9, 2004
32 Kan. App. 2 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004)

Summary

finding that the condition of courtesy probation that defendant waive hearsay objections at later hearings did not violate due process

Summary of this case from State v. Yazell

Opinion

No. 89,918.

July 9, 2004.

Appeal from the Sedgwick.


Unpublished Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Conner

Court of Appeals of Kansas
Jul 9, 2004
32 Kan. App. 2 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004)

finding that the condition of courtesy probation that defendant waive hearsay objections at later hearings did not violate due process

Summary of this case from State v. Yazell
Case details for

State v. Conner

Case Details

Full title:State v. Conner

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas

Date published: Jul 9, 2004

Citations

32 Kan. App. 2 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

State v. Yazell

Yet the district court did not err here because Yazell waived any hearsay objection. See State v. Conner, No.…