From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Congdon

Supreme Court of Idaho
Dec 20, 1974
529 P.2d 773 (Idaho 1974)

Opinion

No. 11488.

December 20, 1974.

APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, ELMORE COUNTY, ALFRED C. HAGAN, J.

Howard Manweiler, Boise, Jerry L. Wegman, Moscow, for defendant-appellant.

W. Anthony Park, Atty. Gen., Conley Ward, Jr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.


Appellant, who was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance based upon his plea of guilty, appeals solely on the claim that he was under the influence of paint thinner fumes at the time he entered his plea of guilty, and thus that plea was not voluntarily entered. The record does not support this allegation. Such matters, outside of the record, cannot be considered on appeal, but must be raised, if at all, by an application for post conviction relief. I.C. § 19-4901 et seq.

Judgment of conviction affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Congdon

Supreme Court of Idaho
Dec 20, 1974
529 P.2d 773 (Idaho 1974)
Case details for

State v. Congdon

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Duane A. CONGDON…

Court:Supreme Court of Idaho

Date published: Dec 20, 1974

Citations

529 P.2d 773 (Idaho 1974)
529 P.2d 773

Citing Cases

State v. Spry

Kraft v. State, 100 Idaho 671, 674, 603 P.2d 1005, 1008 (1979). Because the matters raised by Spry are…

State v. Lawrence

Even if the allegedly illegal search and seizure did work a manifest injustice, however, the facts of the…