From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Comrie

COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
Jun 15, 2016
NO. 2016-KA-0081 (La. Ct. App. Jun. 15, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 2016-KA-0081

06-15-2016

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. LEIGHTON COMRIE


BELSOME, J. DISSENTS WITH REASONS.

I respectfully dissent from the majority and find error in the trial court's failure to wait the mandatory three days between conviction and the imposition of sentence as required by La. C.Cr.P. art. 873. This court has recognized that the purpose of the three day delay is to allow the defendant time to file post-trial motions, including a motion for new trial which must be filed between the verdict and the sentence. State v. Barra, 572 So.2d 1187, 1191 (La. App. 4 Cir. 1990); State v. Tarto, 517 So.2d 1216, 1217 (La. App. 4 Cir. 1987). If the defendant does not expressly waive the delay, a sentence imposed within the three day period should be vacated. La. C.Cr.P. art. 873 Official Revision Comments (a) and (c); Barra, 572 So.2d at 1190. Because the record is void of any indication that the defendant expressly waived the delay, I would vacate the defendant's sentence and remand for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Comrie

COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
Jun 15, 2016
NO. 2016-KA-0081 (La. Ct. App. Jun. 15, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Comrie

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. LEIGHTON COMRIE

Court:COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jun 15, 2016

Citations

NO. 2016-KA-0081 (La. Ct. App. Jun. 15, 2016)