Summary
In Coleman, the defendant appealed the district court's restitution order, contending the court abused its discretion in using the replacement cost or original purchase price rather than the fair market value to determine the amount of restitution.
Summary of this case from State v. KarlyleOpinion
No. 92,302.
August 26, 2005.
Appeal from Sedgwick.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.