Opinion
No. 20170315
02-22-2018
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Romez Michael Coleman, Jr., Defendant and Appellant
Haley L. Wamstad, Assistant State's Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Russell J. Myhre, Valley City, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lolita G. Hartl Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Haley L. Wamstad, Assistant State's Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Russell J. Myhre, Valley City, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Romez Michael Coleman, Jr., appeals from a criminal judgment for aggravated assault--domestic violence. Coleman argues the State presented insufficient evidence to sustain the guilty verdict and the district court erred in allowing testimony about two physical objects that were subject to a stipulation and order restricting their admission into evidence. Sufficient evidence exists to sustain the criminal judgment, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony about the objects. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
[¶2]