From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 8, 2021
No. 2021-UP-431 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-431 Appellate Case 2020-000231

12-08-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Joey Dean Coleman, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Joey Dean Coleman, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted November 1, 2021

Appeal From Hampton County Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Joey Dean Coleman, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 8, 2021
No. 2021-UP-431 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Joey Dean Coleman, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 8, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-UP-431 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2021)