From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Coleman

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Jun 3, 2021
2021 N.D. 102 (N.D. 2021)

Opinion

20210040

06-03-2021

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Eddie Lee Coleman, Defendant and Appellant

John M. Gonzalez, Assistant State's Attorney, Minot, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant.


Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Todd L. Cresap, Judge.

John M. Gonzalez, Assistant State's Attorney, Minot, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Eddie Lee Coleman appeals from the order deferring imposition of sentence entered after a jury found Coleman guilty of preventing arrest. Coleman argues the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for preventing arrest. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude substantial evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of conviction. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W.VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

State v. Coleman

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Jun 3, 2021
2021 N.D. 102 (N.D. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Eddie Lee Coleman…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Jun 3, 2021

Citations

2021 N.D. 102 (N.D. 2021)
960 N.W.2d 770