State v. Cochran

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Charles Wayne Cochran, Appellant.

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

2012-UP-419 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 11, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-419

07-11-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Charles Wayne Cochran, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. J. Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted July 2, 2012.

Appeal From York County No. 2010-162208, John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Wayne Cochran appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court abused its discretion in revoking his probation based partially on his failure to complete a condition of his probation that was not specifically ordered during sentencing. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.