From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Coakley

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 15, 2016
Appellate Case No. 2014-001229 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 15, 2016)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2014-001229 Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-285

06-15-2016

The State, Respondent, v. Pendral Coakley, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of Columbia; and Solicitor David Michael Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Orangeburg County
Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of Columbia; and Solicitor David Michael Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693-94 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]. Issues not raised and ruled upon in the trial court will not be considered on appeal."); State v. Passmore, 363 S.C. 568, 584, 611 S.E.2d 273, 281 (Ct. App. 2005) ("Imposing this preservation requirement on the appellant is meant to enable the [trial] court to rule properly after it has considered all relevant facts, law, and arguments." (quoting I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant, 338 S.C. 406, 422, 526 S.E.2d 716, 724 (2000))). AFFIRMED. HUFF, SHORT, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------


Summaries of

State v. Coakley

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 15, 2016
Appellate Case No. 2014-001229 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 15, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Coakley

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Pendral Coakley, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 15, 2016

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2014-001229 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 15, 2016)