From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Clemens

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Oct 14, 2021
965 N.W.2d 408 (N.D. 2021)

Opinion

No. 20210136

10-14-2021

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Brenda Lee CLEMENS, Defendant and Appellant

Jayne Pfau, State's Attorney, Forman, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant.


Jayne Pfau, State's Attorney, Forman, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Brenda Lee Clemens appeals from an amended criminal judgment entered after she pled guilty to theft. Clemens argues the district court erred in awarding the restitution amount. We conclude the district court acted within statutory limits. State v. Harstad , 2020 ND 151, ¶ 7, 945 N.W.2d 265 ("When reviewing a restitution order, we look to whether the district court acted within the limits set by statute, which is a standard similar to our abuse of discretion standard."). We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

State v. Clemens

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Oct 14, 2021
965 N.W.2d 408 (N.D. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Clemens

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Brenda Lee CLEMENS…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Oct 14, 2021

Citations

965 N.W.2d 408 (N.D. 2021)

Citing Cases

Cavare, Inc. v. Kjelgren

A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is induced by an erroneous view of the law, if there is no…

Bubel v. Bubel

In cases involving a motion to modify joint residential responsibility under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(6), the…