Opinion
No. ED 110160
12-13-2022
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Chad M. CLARKSON, Appellant.
FOR APPELLANT: Kevin L. Schriener, 141 North Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, Missouri 63105. FOR RESPONDENT: Evan Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
FOR APPELLANT: Kevin L. Schriener, 141 North Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, Missouri 63105.
FOR RESPONDENT: Evan Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Kelly C. Broniec, P.J., Philip M. Hess, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM Chad M. Clarkson ("Movant") pled guilty to one count of driving while intoxicated (DWI), punishable as a persistent offender. After an evidentiary hearing, the motion court denied his Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He appeals the motion court's judgment and raises one point on appeal.
Movant argues the motion court clearly erred because his plea was not knowing and voluntary, resulting in manifest injustice due to Movant's plea counsel's failure to advise Movant of plea counsel's conflict of interest in previously representing Movant's ex-wife in an unrelated paternity case.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court did not err. A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
A Rule 29.07(d) motion to revoke a guilty plea is a civil proceeding. State v. Larson , 79 S.W.3d 891, 893 (Mo. banc 2002). We therefore affirm the judgment under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b).