In State v. Clark (Docket No. 54,220, decided April 29, 1974), a juror's note-taking was held not to be reversible error, where defense counsel knew about it and did not object to it before the jury retired and reached a verdict.
Summary of this case from State v. LedetApril 30, 1974.
Petition for certification denied.
In State v. Clark (Docket No. 54,220, decided April 29, 1974), a juror's note-taking was held not to be reversible error, where defense counsel knew about it and did not object to it before the jury retired and reached a verdict.
Summary of this case from State v. LedetFull title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES CLARK
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date published: Apr 30, 1974
" So far as we can ascertain, the prohibition against note-taking has only been considered in two reported…