From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 11, 2001
256 Conn. 905 (Conn. 2001)

Opinion

Decided April 11, 2001


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 182 (AC 18365), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court's instruction, limiting the jury's use of the evidence regarding the effect of Leroy Townsend's use of marijuana on his credibility, was proper?"

"2. If the answer to the first question is `no,' was the error harmless?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16512.

Michael O. Sheehan, in support of the petition.

Rita M. Shair, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 11, 2001
256 Conn. 905 (Conn. 2001)
Case details for

State v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DUANE CLARK

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Apr 11, 2001

Citations

256 Conn. 905 (Conn. 2001)
772 A.2d 597

Citing Cases

State v. Johnson

(Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Clark, 62 Conn. App. 182, 186-87, 774 A.2d…

State v. Green

First, "[d]id the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court's instruction, limiting the jury's…