From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Washington.
Feb 8, 2017
187 Wn. 2d 1009 (Wash. 2017)

Opinion

No. 93740-1

02-08-2017

State of Washington, Respondent, v. Joshua J. Clark, Petitioner.


ORDER

¶1 Department I of the court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins, and Gordon McCloud, considered the petition for review at its February 7, 2017, Motion Calendar. The Department unanimously agreed that the superior court in imposing discretionary legal financial obligations on the Petitioner in connection with his criminal conviction did not adequately address his present and future ability to pay based on consideration of his financial resources and the nature of the burden that the payment of discretionary costs would impose, as required by RCW 10.01.160(3) and this court's decision in State of Washington v. Nicholas Peter Blazina, 182 Wn.2d 827, 344 P.3d 680 (2015). Pursuant to that decision, the superior court must conduct on the record an individualized inquiry into the Petitioner's current and future ability to pay in light of such nonexclusive factors as the circumstances of his incarceration and his other debts, including nondiscretionary legal financial obligations, and the factors for determining indigency status under GR 34. Accordingly,

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the Petition for Review is granted only on the issue of imposition of discretionary legal financial obligations and the case is remanded to the Superior Court to reconsider the imposition of the discretionary legal financial obligations consistent with the requirements of State of Washington v. Nicholas Peter Blazina, 182 Wn.2d 827 (2015).For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Washington.
Feb 8, 2017
187 Wn. 2d 1009 (Wash. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:State of Washington, Respondent, v. Joshua J. Clark, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Feb 8, 2017

Citations

187 Wn. 2d 1009 (Wash. 2017)
187 Wn. 2d 1009
187 Wash. 2d 1009

Citing Cases

State v. Rodriguez

This court has recently observed that the mandatory or discretionary nature of the $250 jury demand fee is…

State v. Mata

Therefore, we affirm $5, 000 of the fines. Jose Mata cites to a Supreme Court order from 2017, in State v.…