From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Clah

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
May 20, 2024
No. A-1-CA-41113 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 20, 2024)

Opinion

A-1-CA-41113

05-20-2024

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERNEST CLAH, Defendant-Appellee.

Raúl Torrez, Attorney General Benjamin Lammons, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellant Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Melanie C. McNett, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellee


Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly in Odyssey.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY R. David Pederson, District Court Judge

Raúl Torrez, Attorney General Benjamin Lammons, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellant

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Melanie C. McNett, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellee

DISPOSITIONAL ORDER

SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, JUDGE

The State appeals from the district court's order dismissing a charge of child abuse by endangerment, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-6-1(D) (2009), against Defendant and amending the criminal information to charge Defendant with driving while intoxicated with a minor in the vehicle, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 66-8-102.5 (2019) (DWI with a minor). We note the following:

1. On appeal, the State asserts that the district court improperly applied the general/specific statute rule to the child abuse by endangerment and DWI with a minor statutes.

2. While these proceedings were pending, this Court issued an opinion in State v. Saltwater, holding that the general/specific statute rule does not apply to prosecutions where the facts support both charges of DWI with a minor and child abuse by endangerment. 2024-NMCA-018, ¶ 1, 542 P.3d 783.

3. Defendant concedes that Saltwater resolves the issue of law presented in this case, but asserts that the general/specific statute still applies because, at the time of filing his answer brief, the New Mexico Supreme Court had not yet decided whether to grant certiorari in Saltwater.

4. The New Mexico Supreme Court denied certiorari in both cases consolidated for purposes of decision in Saltwater. Id., cert. denied, 2024-NMCERT-001 (S-1-SC-40116), 2023-NMCERT-012 (S-1-SC-40117).

5. This Court concludes that the issue of law presented in this case was addressed by the Court's opinion in Saltwater. See id.

6. This Court has sufficiently considered the foregoing and is otherwise sufficiently advised.

7. We reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with Saltwater. See id.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WE CONCUR J. MILES HANISEE, Judge, JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Clah

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
May 20, 2024
No. A-1-CA-41113 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 20, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Clah

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERNEST CLAH…

Court:Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Date published: May 20, 2024

Citations

No. A-1-CA-41113 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 20, 2024)