From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. City of Alexandria

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 4, 1927
114 So. 492 (La. 1927)

Opinion

No. 28594.

July 11, 1927. Rehearing Denied October 4, 1927.

Appeal from Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides; R.C. Culpepper, Judge.

Mandamus by the State, on the relation of the Calvary Baptist Church, against the City of Alexandria. Judgment for relator, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Thornton, Gist Richey, of Alexandria, for appellant.

Hawthorn Stafford, of Alexandria, for appellee.


On Motion to Remand.


In this case a motion to remand was filed similar in all respects and under the same circumstances as in State ex rel. Hundley v. City of Alexandria (our No. 28,593) ante, p. 624, 114 So. 491, and for the reasons therein assigned.

The motion to remand is therefore denied.

On the Merits.


This case presents exactly the same issues as those presented in State ex rel. Hundley et al. v. City of Alexandria, ante, p. 624, 114 So. 491, this day decided; with but slight difference.

I.

The first difference is that in its answer defendant sets up that the permit was refused because of alleged special conditions applicable exclusively to the property on which this relator seeks to build. But section 4 of Act 237 of 1920, p. 456 (quoted in full in the case above mentioned), requires that such permits shall be granted or refused "according to uniform rules," and hence the attempt of defendant to refuse a permit to this relator on account of alleged special conditions is unwarranted.

II.

The other difference is that the permit herein sought was applied for by petition to the city council, instead of to the city engineer as required by the city ordinance. The law above mentioned clearly authorizes the application to be made to the city or its "governing authority," so that the application herein made to the city council sufficed. Moreover, the record shows that the permit would not have been issued, no matter to whom the application might have been made. And since the law requires no one to do a vain and useless thing, the relator was justified in applying to the courts at once upon the refusal of the council itself to grant it a permit.

Decree.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. City of Alexandria

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 4, 1927
114 So. 492 (La. 1927)
Case details for

State v. City of Alexandria

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH v. CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 4, 1927

Citations

114 So. 492 (La. 1927)
114 So. 492

Citing Cases

State v. Viator

In view of the foregoing limitation of authority, it is clear that, aside from the fact that there is nothing…

Edwards v. City of Hammond

We think the plaintiff, under the facts shown by the record, is entitled to have the permit reinstated and…