From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Christie

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Feb 21, 2019
923 N.W.2d 130 (N.D. 2019)

Opinion

No. 20180286

02-21-2019

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Jeffery Allen CHRISTIE, Defendant and Appellant

Marina Spahr, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee. Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.


Marina Spahr, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee.

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Jeffery Christie appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of class AA felony gross sexual imposition. Christie argues the evidence is legally insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdict. Having reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and giving the verdict the benefit of all inferences reasonably to be drawn in its favor, see State v. White , 2017 ND 51, ¶ 17, 890 N.W.2d 825, we conclude the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen


Summaries of

State v. Christie

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Feb 21, 2019
923 N.W.2d 130 (N.D. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Christie

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Jeffery Allen Christie…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Feb 21, 2019

Citations

923 N.W.2d 130 (N.D. 2019)
2019 N.D. 40