State v. Chrestensen

Full title: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JERAME L. CHRESTENSEN, Appellant

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 23, 2000

996 P.2d 525 (Or. Ct. App. 2000)

996 P.2d 525

Opinion

Nos. 97C21259; CA A100046.

Argued and submitted December 22, 1998.

Filed: February 23, 2000.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County, DUANE R. ERTSGAARD, Judge.

Dan Maloney, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was David E. Groom, Public Defender.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge,^_ and ARMSTRONG Judge.

_ DEITS, C. J., vice, WARREN, P. J.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Defendant pled guilty to two counts of unauthorized use of a weapon. ORS 166.220. On count one, the court imposed a five-year prison sentence followed by 36 months of post-prison supervision; on count two the court imposed a concurrent 18-month prison sentence followed by 36 months of post-prison supervision. Defendant appeals, arguing that the court erred in imposing 36 months of post-prison supervision, when the correct sentence was one 24-month term for each count. He also argues that the court erred in count one, because the overall sentence on that count was unlawful. We affirm.

The state concedes that the correct term of post-prison supervision on both counts is 24 months. However, the post-prison terms for both counts have been corrected by the trial court, and that assignment of error has been dismissed on defendant's motion. With respect to defendant's second contention, the alleged error was not preserved and it is not plain error apparent on the face of the record. State v. Layton, 163 Or. App. 37, 986 P.2d 1221 (1999); State v. McCoy, 152 Or. App. 393, 952 P.2d 572, rev den 327 Or. 83 (1998).

Affirmed.