State v. Chestnut

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Randy Chestnut, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 7, 2021

Appellate Case No. 2019-000747 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 7, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-255 Appellate Case 2019-000747

07-07-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Randy Chestnut, Appellant.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 1, 2021

Appeal From Bamberg County Thomas L. Hughston, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.