Opinion
(11456)
Argued February 18, 1993
Decision released March 16, 1993
Substitute information charging the defendant with the crime of sexual assault in the first degree, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New London and tried to the jury before Purtill, J.; verdict and judgment of guilty, from which the defendant appealed to this court. Affirmed.
Eugene C. Cushman, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).
Lawrence J. Tytla, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was C. Robert Satti, Sr., state's attorney, for the appellee (state).
The defendant appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of the crime of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70(a)(1). After thorough review of the record, transcripts and briefs and affording those claims that are properly before us the appropriate scope of review, we find the defendant's assertions to be without merit.