From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Charleston

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Dec 24, 1996
936 S.W.2d 856 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 69075 Consolidated Appeal

OPINION FILED: December 24, 1996

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY HON. ALPHONSO H. VOORHEES.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.



ORDER


Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of robbery in the second degree and resisting arrest. He also appeals from the denial of his post-conviction motion, Rule 29.15, without an evidentiary hearing. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. The findings of fact made on the post-conviction motion are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears and there was evidence to support the verdict. The parties have been furnished with a statement of the reasons for our decision.

Judgments of conviction affirmed; judgment denying post-conviction motion affirmed. Rules 30.25(b), 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Charleston

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Dec 24, 1996
936 S.W.2d 856 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Charleston

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, vs. MICHAEL CHARLESTON, Appellant. MICHAEL…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO

Date published: Dec 24, 1996

Citations

936 S.W.2d 856 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)