From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Charles

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
May 14, 2018
NO. 2018 KW 0310 (La. Ct. App. May. 14, 2018)

Opinion

NO. 2018 KW 0310

05-14-2018

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. STEVEN JERMAINE CHARLES


In Re: Steven Jermaine Charles, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 548,792. BEFORE: HIGGINBOTHAM, HOLDRIDGE, AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. Relator failed to identify with reasonable specificity that his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel might entitle him to postconviction relief. Therefore, the trial transcript was not needed to assist relator with fairly presenting the four claims that he raised in the application for postconviction relief. Compare State v. Bernard, 2009-1552 (La. 6/4/10), 35 So.3d 1082 (per curiam). See also United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 325, 96 S.Ct. 2086, 48 L.Ed.2d 666 (1976). Accordingly, the district court did not err by denying relator's application for postconviction relief and the motion for production of documents.

TMH

GH

AHP

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Charles

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
May 14, 2018
NO. 2018 KW 0310 (La. Ct. App. May. 14, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Charles

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. STEVEN JERMAINE CHARLES

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: May 14, 2018

Citations

NO. 2018 KW 0310 (La. Ct. App. May. 14, 2018)