From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Chapman

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jan 15, 2008
243 S.W.3d 491 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 88377.

January 15, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Michael P. David, Judge.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cory Lee Atkins, Jefferson City, MO, for plaintiff/respondent.

Michelle M. Rivera, Saint Louis, MO, for defendant/appellant.

Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.



ORDER


Defendant, James E. Chapman, appeals from his convictions of forcible sodomy, assault in the second degree, armed criminal action, kidnapping, and attempted forcible sodomy. Defendant contends the trial court erred in allowing the State to present evidence of the victim's condition after the alleged sexual offense.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there is no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Chapman

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jan 15, 2008
243 S.W.3d 491 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

State v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James E. CHAPMAN…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jan 15, 2008

Citations

243 S.W.3d 491 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Chapman v. Steele

On January 15, 2008, the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Resp. Ex. E;…