Opinion
2022-KH-01298
02-07-2023
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ANTHONY JOSEPH CHANEY
IN RE: Anthony J. Chaney - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Writ Of Certiorari, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Number(s) 2019-F-0239, Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2022 KW 0585;
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
SJC
JLW
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY
PER CURIAM:
Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.