Petitioner appealed, assigning error to the trial court's refusal to grant his request for a continuance, the court's refusal to appoint counsel for the trial, and the court's failure to appoint counsel for sentencing. RE 108 at 15, 21. The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion and the Oregon Supreme Court denied a petition for review. State v. Chandler, 135 P.3d 859 (Or.App. 2006); State v. Chandler, 142 P.3d 73 (Or. 2006). After petitioner advanced his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation concluding that because the "state trial court neither arrived at a conclusion of law opposite to the Supreme Court nor decided a case differently than the Supreme Court on a set of materially indistinguishable facts, the court did not act contrary to clearly established Federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States."