From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Chalfant

Supreme Court of Iowa
May 22, 1974
219 N.W.2d 2 (Iowa 1974)

Opinion

No. 56008.

May 22, 1974.

APPEAL FROM MUNICIPAL COURT OF DES MOINES, POLK COUNTY, RAY HARRISON, J.

Charles F. Glenn, West Des Moines, for appellant.

Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., Fred M. Haskins, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Ray Fenton, County Atty., for appellee.

Submitted to MOORE, C.J., and MASON, RAWLINGS, REYNOLDSON and HARRIS, JJ.


Defendant was charged, tried, convicted and fined $100 for failure to abate a rat harborage in violation of county health regulations promulgated under Code section 137.6(2). He appeals. We affirm.

Defendant assigns one error — his motion to dismiss, made at the close of State's evidence should have been sustained. The motion was not renewed at the close of all evidence.

We have consistently held the trial court is not required to sustain a motion to dismiss or for directed verdict at the close of the State's evidence in chief. No error can be predicated upon the court's failure to sustain the motion. State v. Warren, Iowa 1974, 212 N.W.2d 509, 516. Defendant waives any error by failing to renew his motion at the close of all the evidence. State v. Johnson, Iowa 1974, 216 N.W.2d 337; State v. Houston, Iowa 1973, 206 N.W.2d 687, 692; State v. Tokatlian, 203 N.W.2d 116, 119.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Chalfant

Supreme Court of Iowa
May 22, 1974
219 N.W.2d 2 (Iowa 1974)
Case details for

State v. Chalfant

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Robert CHALFANT, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Iowa

Date published: May 22, 1974

Citations

219 N.W.2d 2 (Iowa 1974)