From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cedar Works

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1911
70 S.E. 467 (N.C. 1911)

Opinion

(Filed 8 March, 1911.)

Navigable Streams — Obstruction — Evidence — Burden of Proof.

To maintain an indictment for obstructing a canal, it must be shown that the canal was a navigable stream.

APPEAL by defendant from J. S. Adams, J., at Fall Term, 1910, of TYRRELL.

Attorney-General and George L. Jones for the State.

Aycock Winston and W. M. Bond for defendant.


The defendant was indicted for obstructing (Basnight's) canal. There is no evidence to show that the canal was a public navigable stream, and his Honor erred in submitting the case to the jury.

This renders it unnecessary to consider any of the other exceptions in the record.

Error.


Summaries of

State v. Cedar Works

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1911
70 S.E. 467 (N.C. 1911)
Case details for

State v. Cedar Works

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. CEDAR WORKS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1911

Citations

70 S.E. 467 (N.C. 1911)
154 N.C. 649