From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cataldo

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Jan 15, 2016
NO. 2015 KW 1951 (La. Ct. App. Jan. 15, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 2015 KW 1951

01-15-2016

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. MICHAEL PATRICK CATALDO


In Re: Michael Patrick Cataldo, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 566162-1. BEFORE: PETTIGREW, HIGGINBOTHAM, AND GRAIN, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to comply with Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4-3 and 4-5(C)(11), by failing to include documentation of a timely request for a return date, and the actual return date set by the district court. Relator failed to include in the affidavit the addresses and telephone numbers of the judge and opposing counsel. Relator also failed to comply with Rule 4-5(C)(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (9) and (10), by failing to include an index, the jurisdictional statement, the status of the case in the statement of the case, the issues, the assignments of error, a prayer for relief, a statement that no opposing written document was filed, and the pertinent court minutes. Relator also failed to comply with the page numbering requirements of Rule 4-5(B). Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9. Any future filing on this issue should include the entire contents of this application, the missing items noted above, and a copy of this ruling.

JTP

TMH

WJC

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Cataldo

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Jan 15, 2016
NO. 2015 KW 1951 (La. Ct. App. Jan. 15, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Cataldo

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. MICHAEL PATRICK CATALDO

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 15, 2016

Citations

NO. 2015 KW 1951 (La. Ct. App. Jan. 15, 2016)