From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Castillon

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Nov 29, 2017
SCWC-16-0000421 (Haw. Nov. 29, 2017)

Opinion

SCWC-16-0000421

11-29-2017

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHELLE HELEN CASTILLON, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.


CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-16-0000421; CASE NO. 3DTC-15-042273) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
()

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Michelle Helen Castillon's application for writ of certiorari filed on October 11, 2017, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 29, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson


Summaries of

State v. Castillon

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Nov 29, 2017
SCWC-16-0000421 (Haw. Nov. 29, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Castillon

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHELLE HELEN…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Nov 29, 2017

Citations

SCWC-16-0000421 (Haw. Nov. 29, 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Pierce

Pierce contends HRS § 286-102(a)(1) is an element of the offense, thus, the State has the burden to prove…

State v. Loo

In support of his argument, Loo cites this court's opinion in State v. Matautia, 81 Hawai'i 76, 83, 912 P.2d…