Opinion
No. 2012AP1596–CR.
2013-08-13
Furthermore, in closing arguments, trial counsel argued that Castaneda was not guilty of battery because he lacked the requisite intent: (Emphasis added.)
No. 2012AP1596–CR.
2013-08-13
Furthermore, in closing arguments, trial counsel argued that Castaneda was not guilty of battery because he lacked the requisite intent: (Emphasis added.)
Full title:STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Adrian CASTANEDA…
Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Date published: Aug 13, 2013