From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cary

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Feb 5, 2014
845 N.W.2d 720 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13–0039.

2014-02-5

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. James Blake CARY, Defendant–Appellant.


In sum, the district court may have made a misstatement, but that cannot be determined from this record. The only thing that can be determined from this record, without resort to speculation, is that the district court explicitly stated it considered defendant's burglary conviction when imposing sentence when the defendant has not been convicted of burglary. This requires the sentence be vacated and this matter remanded for sentencing. See State v. Gonzalez, 582 N.W.2d 515, 516 (Iowa 1998) (noting the general rule a court “may not consider an unproven or unprosecuted offense when sentencing a defendant”).


Summaries of

State v. Cary

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Feb 5, 2014
845 N.W.2d 720 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Cary

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. James Blake CARY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Feb 5, 2014

Citations

845 N.W.2d 720 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

State v. White

This requires the sentence be vacated and this matter remanded for sentencing. See State v. Gonzalez, 582…