" (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Capasso , 203 Conn. App. 333, 338–39, 248 A.3d 58, cert. denied, 336 Conn. 939, 249 A.3d 352 (2021). A
(Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Capasso , 203 Conn. App. 333, 338, 248 A.3d 58, cert. denied, 336 Conn. 939, 249 A.3d 352 (2021) ; see also State v. Sivri , supra, 231 Conn. at 130, 646 A.2d 169 (proof beyond reasonable doubt properly may be based on chain of inferences, each link of which may depend for its validity on validity of prior link in chain); State v. James , 141 Conn. App. 124, 132, 60 A.3d 1011 (same), cert. denied, 308 Conn. 932, 64 A.3d 331 (2013). In the present case, the totality of the evidence presented by the state regarding the defendant's actions, and the permissible inferences drawn therefrom, support the jury's finding that the defendant intended to tamper with evidence.