State v. Canfield

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Clifford Dean Canfield, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 31, 2019

Appellate Case No. 2016-002574 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2019)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2016-002574 Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-404

12-31-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Clifford Dean Canfield, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia; and Clifford Dean Canfield, pro se, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia; and Clifford Dean Canfield, pro se, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.