Summary
In Candia, some of the testimony was helpful to defendant, as the Court of Appeals conceded, stating that Dr. Stirling's testimony that it was unlikely the defendant could actually penetrate C.M.D. was "favorable to Candia."
Summary of this case from State v. KirkmanOpinion
No. 31690-1-II.
July 26, 2005.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 03-1-02005-1, Robert L. Harris, J., entered April 16, 2004.
Reversed by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Morgan, J.; Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., dissenting.