From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Campbell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Feb 6, 2018
539 S.W.3d 120 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105046

02-06-2018

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tamell CAMPBELL, Appellant.

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Christine K. Lesicko, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.


ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Christine K. Lesicko, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tamell Campbell appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. The trial court did not clearly err in sustaining the State's challenge to the defendant's peremptory strike under Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Campbell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Feb 6, 2018
539 S.W.3d 120 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tamell CAMPBELL, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Feb 6, 2018

Citations

539 S.W.3d 120 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

State v. Campbell

That same month, Defendant appealed from that judgment. This Court affirmed the judgment containing…