Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

State v. Campbell

No. W2001-01121-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 19, 2002)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
State v. Campbell

1 Citing case

  1. State v. Smith

    No. E2002-01147-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 18, 2003)   Cited 3 times
    In Smith, among other issues, this Court found the record did not support the State's argument that the defendant is an offender whose record of criminal activity is extensive. Smith, 2003 WL 1233431, at *4.

    Unlike other cases where this court has upheld the finding that a defendant was a professional criminal, the presentence report in this case indicates only two prior convictions, both occurring several years before the instant offenses.See State v. Otis Campbell, No. W2001-01121-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn.Crim.App., at Jackson, Feb. 19, 2002). The state must prove that the defendant obtained a major source of his livelihood from his criminal acts.