From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Calvo

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Feb 11, 2015
343 P.3d 1285 (Or. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

11C51551 A153492.

02-11-2015

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Joseph Mendiola CALVO, Defendant–Appellant.

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Mary M. Reese, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Shannon T. Reel, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Mary M. Reese, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Shannon T. Reel, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before LAGESEN, Presiding Judge, and FLYNN, Judge, and DE MUNIZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.Defendant appeals his conviction for multiple sexual offenses. He argues that the trial court erred in withholding from disclosure school records of the victim and her sister after conducting an in camera inspection and asks this court to review the records for any relevant impeachment or exculpatory evidence. The state does not oppose this request. We have reviewed the materials in camera and conclude that the trial court did not err when it withheld the school records from disclosure.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Calvo

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Feb 11, 2015
343 P.3d 1285 (Or. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Calvo

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Joseph Mendiola CALVO…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Feb 11, 2015

Citations

343 P.3d 1285 (Or. Ct. App. 2015)
343 P.3d 1285