From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Calton

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Mar 25, 2004
No. 2-03-523-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 25, 2004)

Opinion

No. 2-03-523-CR.

Delivered March 25, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

Appeal from the 213th District Court of Tarrant County.

Charles M. Mallin, Asst. D.A.; Fort Worth for State. Jack V. Strickland; Fort Worth for Appellee.

Panel D: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.


We have considered "State's Motion To Dismiss Appeal." The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex.R.App.P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; Tex.R.App.P. 43.2(f). It is further ordered that the State shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(f) (Vernon Supp. 2004).


Summaries of

State v. Calton

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Mar 25, 2004
No. 2-03-523-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 25, 2004)
Case details for

State v. Calton

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF TEXAS, State v. ALLEN FRITZGERALD CALTON, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Mar 25, 2004

Citations

No. 2-03-523-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 25, 2004)