From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Byrd

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Dec 1, 1998
982 S.W.2d 737 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72273.

OPINION FILED: December 1, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. THOMAS C. GRADY, JUDGE.

Raymound J. Capelovitch, Assistant Public Defender, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, John M. Morris, Asst. Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before Paul J. Simon, P.J., and Kathianne Knaup Crane and Lawrence E. Mooney, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant, Ronnie Byrd, appeals from his conviction, by a jury, of one count of trafficking drugs in the second degree, section 195.223, RSMo 1994. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to quantity and asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.


Summaries of

State v. Byrd

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Dec 1, 1998
982 S.W.2d 737 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Byrd

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, vs. RONNIE BYRD…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE

Date published: Dec 1, 1998

Citations

982 S.W.2d 737 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)